Protecting FF Bags During Startup

Protecting Fabric Filter Bags During Startup

The first 24-48 hours of a filter bag’s operation can be the most critical in determining its overall life expectancy. The new bag’s unprotected fabric is vulnerable to high velocity particulate becoming embedded into the indices of the media. When this happens, trapped dust accelerates the blinding process, increases the average drag/restriction coefficient, and significantly shorten the bag’s life.

Flow rate permeability is an excellent way to measure the life stages and life expectancy of a bag. Permeability for new bags is usually in the range of 25-60 CFM/ft-2. For seasoned bags, the range is usually 5-10 CFM/ft-2. A blinded bag’s permeability may be less than 2 CFM/ft-2. Considering this large disparity in flow rates, it’s easy to see how new bags/compartments are able to receive a lot more gas/dust at a higher velocity than those that are old and blinded.

The key to preventing premature blinding is to follow three simple rules during startup.

  1. Apply a compatible protective precoat material to the filter bags before starting the process gas flow.
  2. Limit the gas flow to the new bags/compartment; a flow level at or near the design filtering velocity/air to cloth ratio is ideal.
  3. Reduce or stop the cleaning energy until the dust cake builds up to a level that requires cleaning.

Starting up a new bag is a critical operation that should not be taken lightly. Following the rules outlined above greatly reduces the chances of premature bag damage. Putting in this effort and attention now will pay dividends later in the form of a longer bag life, and energy/cost savings from reduced operating differential pressure.

 

Helpful Resources

KnowledgeBase: Misconceptions Overview

KnowledgeBase: FF Operation & Maintenance

Our Capabilities: Outage & Project Management

Our Capabilities: Analytical & Laboratory Services

Workshops & Training: Overview

Go Back

Justifying Controls with Opacity-Driven Energy Optimization

Paper Mill Controls Upgrade

At a paper mill in New England, a long-delayed controls upgrade project was cost-justified within eight months of completion. The improved performance and energy savings from an ESP controls project saved the mill an average of $8,000 per month. ...

Read the White Paper

"I wish we had made the upgrade years ago when you first recommended it!"

Project Engineer

Paper Mill

Back to Top